<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>yurisk.info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yurisk.info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yurisk.info</link>
	<description>Yuri Slobodyanyuk&#039;s blog on IT Security and Networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 06:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Disabling SSL Deep inspection proxy in Fortigate should be easier</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2013/05/04/disabling-ssl-deep-inspection-proxy-in-fortigate-should-be-easier/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2013/05/04/disabling-ssl-deep-inspection-proxy-in-fortigate-should-be-easier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 11:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fortigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one can be filed under Fortinet ‘undocumented/unwanted’ feature rather than bug.The case in question: Fortigate 80C , firmware 4 something, all  subscriptions are up-to-date, no crazy configurations, life is beautiful&#8230; Until client adds to his LAN some back-up device that works by gathering data from clients installed on PCs and then pushes updates from [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="adsenseads"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-8869138859163494";
/* Inside_posts */
google_ad_slot = "4303373119";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div>
<p dir="ltr">This one can be filed under Fortinet ‘undocumented/unwanted’ feature rather than bug.The case in question: Fortigate 80C , firmware 4 something, all  subscriptions are up-to-date, no crazy configurations, life is beautiful&#8230; Until client adds to his LAN some back-up device that works by gathering data from clients installed on PCs and then pushes updates from behind Fortigate to the Internet residing cloud storage.</p>
<p dir="ltr">The problem with it occurred on install of the backup box and its reason also was clear as vodka &#8211; the backup box uses POP3s protocol (POP3 encrypted with SSL using certificates) to communicate with cloud servers and when this communication is passing the Fortigate, the Fortigate intercepts it for SSL Deep inspection (man-in-the-middle) and presents to the cloud servers its own (i.e. Fortigate) SSL certificate, thus preventing the bakup box to use its own SSL certificate.  The remote cloud servers, of course, refuse to accept it.</p>
<p dir="ltr">So, what’s the fuss? Just disable SSL inspection and that’s it, no ? According to the Fortinet yes, <a href="http://kb.fortinet.com/kb/microsites/microsite.do?cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=FD31820">http://kb.fortinet.com/kb/microsites/microsite.do?cmd=displayKC&amp;externalId=FD31820</a>   “ FortiGate Intercepts POP3S, SMTPS and IMAPS certificates “ . But the real life says no.</p>
<p dir="ltr">First, the document above lists commands that Fortigate 80C didn’t recognize, ok , no big deal. We tried to remove any protection profile from hosts in question, add protection profile with HTTPS inspection disabled &#8211; still nada .</p>
<p dir="ltr">In the end, as the client didn’t really need this feature at all, we just disabled SSL inspection for good, and it finally did the job.</p>
<p dir="ltr">The steps and output from the device are below.</p>
<div class="cmd">FGT80C # get  firewall ssl setting</div>
<p>caname              : Fortinet_CA_SSLProxy<br />
cert-cache-capacity : 100<br />
cert-cache-timeout  : 10<br />
no-matching-cipher-action: bypass<br />
proxy-connect-timeout: 30<br />
session-cache-capacity: 500<br />
session-cache-timeout: 20<br />
ssl-dh-bits         : 1024<br />
ssl-max-version     : tls-1.0<br />
ssl-min-version     : ssl-3.0<br />
ssl-send-empty-frags: enable</p>
<p>Get the statistics/diagnostics info about SSL Proxy in Fortigate:</p>
<div class="cmd"> FGT80C # diagnose test application ssl 0</div>
<p>SSL Proxy Test Usage<br />
   1: Dump Memory Usage<br />
   2: Drop all connections<br />
   3: Display PID<br />
   4: Display connection stat<br />
   5: Toggle AV Bypass mode<br />
   6: Display memory statistics<br />
  44: Display info per connection<br />
  11: Display connection TTL list<br />
  12: Clear the SSL certificate cache<br />
  13: Clear the SSL session cache<br />
  14: Display PKey file checksum<br />
  15: Clear the SSL server name cache<br />
  99: Restart proxy<br />
SSL Proxy stats:</p>
<div class="cmd">FGT80C # diagnose test application ssl 4</div>
<p>Current connections (all proxies)   = 12/8048<br />
Running time (HH:MM:SS:usec)        = 57:21:06.569388<br />
Bytes sent                          = 499 (kb)<br />
Bytes received                      = 909 (kb)<br />
Error Count (alloc)                 = 0<br />
Error Count (accept)                = 0<br />
Error Count (bind)                  = 0<br />
Error Count (connect)               = 0<br />
Error Count (read)                  = 0<br />
Error Count (write)                 = 0<br />
Error Count (retry)                 = 0<br />
Error Count (poll)                  = 0<br />
Error Count (unhandled state)       = 0<br />
Error Count (SSL handshake)         = 0<br />
Error Count (SSL internal)          = 0<br />
Last Error                          = 0<br />
IPC Connection Count                = 1<br />
IPC Hand-off Count                  = 7838<br />
IPC Packet Sent Count               = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (connect)           = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (handoff)           = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (send)              = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (socketpair)        = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (timeout)           = 0<br />
Client cipher failure               = 0<br />
Server cipher failure               = 0<br />
SSL decryption failure              = 0<br />
SSL internal error                  = 0<br />
SSL public key too big              = 0<br />
Total Connections Proxied           = 0<br />
Web request  backlog drop           = 0<br />
Web response backlog drop           = 0<br />
AV Bypass                 is off<br />
Drop on backlog           is on<br />
Accounting                is off </p>
<p>This one is important, it shows connections under SSL inspection<br />
Here 13.43.12.77 is remote cloud server (sanitized) and 192.168.10.150 is backup box in LAN.</p>
<div class="cmd">FGT80C# diagnose test application ssl 44</div>
<p>Current https connections = 0<br />
Current imaps connections = 0<br />
proxy=pop3s id=8070 clt=45(r=0, w=0) srv=46(r=1, w=0) c:192.168.10.150:36905 -> s:13.43.12.77:995 c2s/s2c=0/0 state=SSL_CONTINUE_SETUP_STATE duration=0 expire=3541</p>
<p>proxy=pop3s id=8069 clt=43(r=0, w=0) srv=44(r=1, w=0) c:192.168.10.150:56246 -> s:13.43.12.77:995 c2s/s2c=0/0 state=SSL_CONTINUE_SETUP_STATE duration=0 expire=3540</p>
<p>proxy=pop3s id=8068 clt=41(r=0, w=0) srv=42(r=1, w=0) c:192.168.10.150:56245 -> s:13.43.12.77:995 c2s/s2c=0/0 state=SSL_CONTINUE_SETUP_STATE duration=0 expire=3401</p>
<p>proxy=pop3s id=8067 clt=26(r=0, w=0) srv=27(r=1, w=0) c:192.168.10.150:36902 -> s:13.43.12.77:995 c2s/s2c=0/0 state=SSL_CONTINUE_SETUP_STATE duration=0 expire=3399</p>
<p>proxy=pop3s id=8039 clt=24(r=0, w=0) srv=25(r=1, w=0) c:192.168.10.150:40980 -> s:13.43.12.77:995 c2s/s2c=0/0 state=SSL_CONTINUE_SETUP_STATE duration=0 expire=2625</p>
<p>proxy=pop3s id=8032 clt=35(r=0, w=0) srv=36(r=1, w=0) c:192.168.10.150:39432 -> s:13.43.12.77995 c2s/s2c=0/0 state=SSL_CONTINUE_SETUP_STATE duration=0 expire=2424</p>
<p>proxy=pop3s id=8029 clt=28(r=0, w=0) srv=29(r=1, w=0) c:192.168.10.150:39429 -> s:13.43.12.77:995 c2s/s2c=0/0 state=SSL_CONTINUE_SETUP_STATE duration=0 expire=2415</p>
<p>Current pop3s connections = 12<br />
Current smtps connections = 0<br />
Current ftps connections = 0<br />
- Disable SSL proxy for AV scanning :</p>
<div class="cmd">FGT80C # diagnose test application ssl 5</div>
<p>SSL AV Bypass is now on </p>
<div class="cmd">FGT80C3909621311 # diagnose test application ssl 4</div>
<p>Current connections (all proxies)   = 12/8048<br />
Running time (HH:MM:SS:usec)        = 57:22:37.346514<br />
Bytes sent                          = 499 (kb)<br />
Bytes received                      = 909 (kb)<br />
Error Count (alloc)                 = 0<br />
Error Count (accept)                = 0<br />
Error Count (bind)                  = 0<br />
Error Count (connect)               = 0<br />
Error Count (read)                  = 0<br />
Error Count (write)                 = 0<br />
Error Count (retry)                 = 0<br />
Error Count (poll)                  = 0<br />
Error Count (unhandled state)       = 0<br />
Error Count (SSL handshake)         = 0<br />
Error Count (SSL internal)          = 0<br />
Last Error                          = 0<br />
IPC Connection Count                = 1<br />
IPC Hand-off Count                  = 7839<br />
IPC Packet Sent Count               = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (connect)           = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (handoff)           = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (send)              = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (socketpair)        = 0<br />
IPC Error Count (timeout)           = 0<br />
Client cipher failure               = 0<br />
Server cipher failure               = 0<br />
SSL decryption failure              = 0<br />
SSL internal error                  = 0<br />
SSL public key too big              = 0<br />
Total Connections Proxied           = 0<br />
Web request  backlog drop           = 0<br />
Web response backlog drop           = 0<br />
AV Bypass                 is on<br />
Drop on backlog           is on<br />
Accounting                is off </p>
<p>- Making sure it worked:</p>
<div class="cmd">FGT80C3909621311 # diagnose test application ssl 44</div>
<p>Current https connections = 0<br />
Current imaps connections = 0<br />
Current pop3s connections = 0<br />
Current smtps connections = 0<br />
Current ftps connections = 0 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2013/05/04/disabling-ssl-deep-inspection-proxy-in-fortigate-should-be-easier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>md5 sha256 sha-1 tiger and whirlpool sum checker for Windows</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2012/10/08/md5-sha256-sha-1-tiger-and-whirlpool-sum-checker-for-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2012/10/08/md5-sha256-sha-1-tiger-and-whirlpool-sum-checker-for-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying out Amazon AWS Glacier with fastglacier.com as the upload GUI app I looked at few SHA256 sum calculating tools, and found this one by Jesse Kornblum to be the best for Windows. It has some quite useful options like recursive folders calculation, file size limitation, reading file names from file and hash comparing. Be [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying out Amazon <a href="https://console.aws.amazon.com/glacier/" target="_blank"> AWS Glacier </a> with <a href="http://fastglacier.com" target="_blank">fastglacier.com</a> as the upload GUI app I looked at few SHA256 sum calculating tools, and found this one by <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/md5deep/" target="_blank"> Jesse Kornblum </a> to be the best for Windows.<br />
It has some quite useful options like recursive folders calculation, file size limitation, reading file names from file and hash comparing. Be aware it is command-line only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2012/10/08/md5-sha256-sha-1-tiger-and-whirlpool-sum-checker-for-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Checkpoint SNX 75 does work on Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2012/08/03/checkpoint-snx-75-does-work-on-mac-os-x-10-8-mountain-lion/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2012/08/03/checkpoint-snx-75-does-work-on-mac-os-x-10-8-mountain-lion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 04:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint NG/NGX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While not mentioned explicitly in Release Notes for SNX 75 (it lists there only Mac OS X 10.7, 10.7.1, 10.7.2 Lion, 32-bit and 64-bit as supported versions) , it does work with new version of Apple Mac.Yesterday I did it for R71.40  and it worked just fine, you have to install hotfix though - SNX_MACOS.linux.tgz .]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not mentioned explicitly in <a href="http://downloads.checkpoint.com/dc/download.htm?ID=12503" target="_blank">Release Notes for SNX 75</a> (it lists there only Mac OS X 10.7, 10.7.1, 10.7.2 Lion, 32-bit and 64-bit as supported versions) , it does work with new version of Apple Mac.<br />Yesterday I did it for R71.40  and it worked just fine, you have to install hotfix though - SNX_MACOS.linux.tgz .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2012/08/03/checkpoint-snx-75-does-work-on-mac-os-x-10-8-mountain-lion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agressive scans from 69.175.126.170 &#8211; HD Moore is trying to save the Internet</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2012/07/31/agressive-scans-from-69-175-126-170-hd-moore-is-trying-to-save-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2012/07/31/agressive-scans-from-69-175-126-170-hd-moore-is-trying-to-save-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scan of the week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been  seeing this for some time so you will see it soon too. We speak here mostly about SNMP probes coming from a set of very specific IPs. If you do a search on IP you get to the webpage below (critical.io ) , explaining to the reader that it constitutes a vulnerability/misconfiguration disclosure [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been  seeing this for some time so you will see it soon too. We speak here mostly about SNMP probes coming from a set of very specific IPs. If you do a search on IP you get to the webpage below (<a href="http://critical.io">critical.io </a>) , explaining to the reader that it constitutes a vulnerability/misconfiguration disclosure effort by HD Moore exercised on the wide Internet for our own good . <del>I haven&#8217;t had answer from Hd Moore himself (probably because of Defcon:) ) so can&#8217;t really deny nor confirm this claim I did heard</del>  I did hear from him,  it is indeed scans done by him.<br />
Anyway, as the scans are much more frequent/agressive than usual attack/scan attempts I see everyday, I decided , while not seeing them as any threat, to filter them out and here are IP addresses if you decide too.<br />
IPs:<br />
69.175.126.168/29  69.175.126.170<br />
184.154.42.192/29  184.154.42.194<br />
173.236.44.96/29   173.236.44.98<br />
69.175.54.104/29   69.175.54.106<br />
173.236.30.120/29 173.236.30.122<br />
96.127.150.216/29 96.127.150.218   <br />
Screenshot of the website hosted on aforementioned IPs:</p>
<p><a href="http://yurisk.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/criticalio.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-1874" title="criticalio" src="http://yurisk.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/criticalio-150x150.jpg" alt="screenshot of the critical.io webpage" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2012/07/31/agressive-scans-from-69-175-126-170-hd-moore-is-trying-to-save-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCP and Checkpoint R75 problems</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2012/07/23/scp-and-checkpoint-r75-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2012/07/23/scp-and-checkpoint-r75-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint NG/NGX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a known issue with transferring big files (bigger than 1 Mb) from/to SecurePlatform firewall by Checkpoint you should be aware of. The file transfer fails with some error about buffers. The problem is that Checkpoint SPLAT comes with old opensshd daemon , which has a bug in it dated 2006  ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184357 ) [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a known issue with transferring big files (bigger than 1 Mb) from/to SecurePlatform firewall by Checkpoint you should be aware of. The file transfer fails with some error about buffers. The problem is that Checkpoint SPLAT comes with old opensshd daemon , which has a bug in it dated 2006  ( <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184357">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184357</a> ) causing transfer to fail if SCP client is trying to  use buffer bigger than 1 Mb . And as (the only) Windows based client WinSCP (that in turn uses putty code) has  been using buffer larger than that for ages, trying to use versions of WinSCP newer than 3.x results in failure .<br />
Checkpoint have a hotfix for that, according to SK sk66195, but the less intrusive alternative is to use  older versions &#8211; pscp 0.60 and Winscp 3.x (e.g. 3.7.4)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2012/07/23/scp-and-checkpoint-r75-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bit of privacy on Youtube is now available</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2012/07/18/a-bit-of-privacy-on-youtube-is-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2012/07/18/a-bit-of-privacy-on-youtube-is-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are not careful enough not to upload any identifiable videos to Youtube.com , at least make it less damaging to the people in the video by blurring faces with the new tool introduced by them : http://youtube-global.blogspot.co.il/2012/07/face-blurring-when-footage-requires.html]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are not careful enough not to upload any identifiable videos to <a href="http://Youtube.com" title="Youtube.com">Youtube.com</a> , at least make it less damaging to the people in the video by blurring faces with the new tool<br />
introduced by them : <a href="http://youtube-global.blogspot.co.il/2012/07/face-blurring-when-footage-requires.html" title="Face blurring on Youtube" target="_blank">http://youtube-global.blogspot.co.il/2012/07/face-blurring-when-footage-requires.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2012/07/18/a-bit-of-privacy-on-youtube-is-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to enroll VPN client with IOS CA</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2012/04/16/how-to-enroll-vpn-client-with-ios-ca/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2012/04/16/how-to-enroll-vpn-client-with-ios-ca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IOS Cisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you didn&#8217;t notice Cisco IOS routers can serve as CA servers as well. The example configurations are easy to find on the cisco.com but the only trick to know when enrolling Cisco VPN client with IOS CA is the syntax you put as url &#8211; the string should look: http://192.182.12.1:80/cgi-bin/pkiclient.exe I attach below screenshot [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you didn&#8217;t notice Cisco IOS routers can serve as CA servers as well. The example configurations are easy to find on the cisco.com but the only trick to know when enrolling Cisco VPN client with IOS CA is the syntax you put as url &#8211; the string should look:<br />
<strong> http://192.182.12.1:80/cgi-bin/pkiclient.exe</strong><br />
I attach below screenshot so you can see what I mean.<br />
Some references as well .<br />
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/guide/sec_cfg_mng_cert_serv_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html" target="_blank"> www.cisco.com </a> <br /><a href="http://ieoc.com/forums/t/12071.aspx" target="_blank">ieoc.com/forums/t/12071.aspx</a><br />
<div id="attachment_1851" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://yurisk.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/certenrol.png"><img src="http://yurisk.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/certenrol-150x150.png" alt="URL to use when enrolling with Cisco CA" title="CA enrol with Cisco router" width="150" height="150" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1851" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">PKI client enrol with cisco CA</p></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2012/04/16/how-to-enroll-vpn-client-with-ios-ca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check duplex and speed settings of all interfaces in one go</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2012/02/16/check-duplex-and-speed-settings-of-all-interfaces-in-one-go/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2012/02/16/check-duplex-and-speed-settings-of-all-interfaces-in-one-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awk weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint NG/NGX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awk weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories from the trenches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the first things you do when checking connectivity issues on the Checkpoint (or any networking gear for that matter) is to see speed and duplex parameters of the interfaces. But have you tried to do it on a firewall with 15-20 interfaces ? No fun entering one by one interfaces&#8217; names. Here is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the first things you do when checking connectivity issues on the Checkpoint (or any networking gear for that matter) is to see speed and duplex parameters of the interfaces. But have you tried to do it on a firewall with 15-20 interfaces ?<br />
No fun entering one by one interfaces&#8217; names. Here is the one-liner I use to get speed and duplex settings of all interfaces in one go.</p>
<p>#<strong> for ii in $(ifconfig | awk &#39; /Ethernet/ {print $1}&#39;) ;do ethtool $ii; done | egrep  &#39;eth|Speed|Duplex&#39; </strong><br />
Settings for eth0:<br />
Speed: 100Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth1:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth1.150:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth1.160:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth1.161:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth1.270:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth1.271:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
<span id="more-1834"></span><br />
Settings for eth1.281:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth1.35:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth2:<br />
Speed: 100Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth3:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.112:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.211:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.311:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.71:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.72:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.73:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.413:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.419:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.451:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.407:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth4.408:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth5:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full<br />
Settings for eth7:<br />
Speed: 1000Mb/s<br />
Duplex: Full</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2012/02/16/check-duplex-and-speed-settings-of-all-interfaces-in-one-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Funny way to expire Antispam license in Checkpoint</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2012/02/13/funny-way-to-expire-antispam-license-in-checkpoint/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2012/02/13/funny-way-to-expire-antispam-license-in-checkpoint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint NG/NGX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stories from the trenches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After years with Checkpoint products I came to conclusion that if you don&#8217;t have logical explanation why something doesn&#8217;t work, it is most probably license issue. My client stopped getting emails behind UTM-132 at some remote branch . Doing the basics &#8211; telnet to port 25 (Checkpoint answered as it should),Exchange answering on port 25 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After years with Checkpoint products I came to conclusion that if you don&#8217;t have logical explanation why something doesn&#8217;t work, it is most probably license issue.<br />
My client stopped getting emails behind UTM-132 at some remote branch . Doing the basics &#8211; telnet to port 25 (Checkpoint answered as it should),Exchange answering on port 25 as well didn&#8217;t come up with anything.<br />
Then I looked at mail spool in the Checkpoint and voila, all the emails that didn&#8217;t reach internal Exchange were stuck there for no obvious reason.<br />
The reason became obvious when I looked at the SmartTracker and saw &#8220;AntiSpam service license expired&#8221; message . Only then did I recall that this UTM had once Total security license that included the Antispam , but had expired long ago.<br />
Why upon expiring license Checkpoint instead of passing mails without Antispam filtering decided to &#8220;hijack&#8221; the mails is left without answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2012/02/13/funny-way-to-expire-antispam-license-in-checkpoint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally GEO location blocking has arrived to Fortigate</title>
		<link>http://yurisk.info/2012/02/09/finally-geo-location-blocking-has-arrived-to-fortigate/</link>
		<comments>http://yurisk.info/2012/02/09/finally-geo-location-blocking-has-arrived-to-fortigate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fortigate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yurisk.info/?p=1810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was predictable thing for Fortinet to do as everyone else has already been doing so. I haven’t verified myself but according to the informed source (can only say his name &#8211; Hen) they are using Maxmind database . So let’s see how to do it . First you create in New Address dialog window [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was predictable thing for Fortinet to do as everyone else has already been doing so.<br />
I haven’t verified myself but according to the informed source (can only say his name &#8211; Hen) they are using<br />
<a href="http://www.maxmind.com/"> Maxmind database</a> . So let’s see how to do it .<br />
First you create in New Address dialog window the Geography type object specifying the country. As you can only pick one country per address use Address Groups to combine few countries together.<br />
After creating such Address object you can use it in Firewall Policy just as you would the usual Address.<br />
Personal Note: While there is an ongoing fuss/hysteria about the cyberwar being waged that started 2 weeks ago when Saudi “hackers” DDOS’ed few Israel websites, from what I see in the field it is more of a FUD campaign, one of the byproducts of which is rush of many website owners in Israel to block Saudi Arabia IPs (or any Arabic world IPs for that matter). What happened in fact was that most of DDOS came from anywhere but Arab world (Russia, China,US) , from botnets-for-hire.<br />
The only reason I can think of why you would use Geo location block is to lower noise/size of logs by silently dropping traffic from unwanted countries.<br />

<a href='http://yurisk.info/2012/02/09/finally-geo-location-blocking-has-arrived-to-fortigate/fortigate_geolocation1/' title='Fortigate_geolocation1'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://yurisk.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Fortigate_geolocation1-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Fortigate_geolocation1" /></a>
<a href='http://yurisk.info/2012/02/09/finally-geo-location-blocking-has-arrived-to-fortigate/fortigate_geolocation2/' title='Fortigate_geolocation2'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://yurisk.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Fortigate_geolocation2-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Fortigate_geolocation2" /></a>
<a href='http://yurisk.info/2012/02/09/finally-geo-location-blocking-has-arrived-to-fortigate/fortigate_geolocation3/' title='Fortigate_geolocation3'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://yurisk.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Fortigate_geolocation3-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Fortigate_geolocation3" /></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yurisk.info/2012/02/09/finally-geo-location-blocking-has-arrived-to-fortigate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
